Service
Search
Schedule New booking Join us Contact

The Gemini Cooperation has made headlines with its plan to raise schedule reliability above 80%. But can the carriers really get rid of shipping delays? Shippers, forwarders and ports should remain prudent, Drewry consultants suggest.

In a recent investor presentation, Maersk CEO Vincent Clerc said that charging customers a premium for on-time ship arrivals “is a conversation we’ve started” and added that Gemini needed to show that it had a consistent track record of improved reliability.

But as average waiting times of arriving containerships in Europe lengthened, to an average of 1.9 days in October, ocean carriers found it difficult to keep to their schedules overall.

Ship waiting times at several major European ports were longer than the equivalent times at ports in China, based on Drewry Container Capacity Insight data (see extract below).

Average ship waiting time by port of arrival on October (days)

Average ship waiting time by port of arrival on October (days)

Source: Drewry Container Capacity Insight and Ports and Terminals Insight

There are several potential causes of shipping delays, including port strikes, port congestion, bad weather, issues with infrastructures and accidents (eg the “Ever Given” Suez Canal incident), roll-overs and schedule changes. Some of these are clearly outside the control of carriers and/or of ports. 

The chart below marries unique Drewry data on port congestion (measured as average pre-berth ship waiting times) and schedule reliability (measured as the percentage of ships arriving within 24 hours of the scheduled arrival promised 2-6 weeks before).

The recent history of schedule reliability on the Asia-Europe route was five months of improvement, to 44% of ships arriving on time, before a decline in on-time performance in October to 39% – see chart. Feederships are currently the most exposed to port delays in Europe, according to our market contacts.

Ship waiting times vs schedule reliability

Ship waiting times vs schedule reliability

Source: Drewry Container Capacity Insight

In Drewry’s opinion, there is no doubt that higher schedule reliability provides significant benefits to several stakeholders (ports, shippers, forwarders) and avoids sizeable costs and inefficiencies (demurrage costs, inefficient terminal operations, more expensive on-carriage required etc.).

On the Asia-Europe trade, Drewry’s comparison of schedule reliability shows that the Gemini alliance’s ships continue to arrive on time more frequently than those of competing alliances. Kudos to Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd – see chart below. The Gemini alliance also tends to cancel fewer sailings than the other alliances.

Average schedule reliability of the alliances on the Asia-Europe route

Average schedule reliability of the alliances on the Asia-Europe route

Source: Drewry Container Capacity Insight

Notes: 1 Average of Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd; 2 average of CMA CGM and Evergreen; 3 Average of ONE and YangMing; 4 MSC is considered here a "one-carrier alliance"

Coming back to the idea of carriers charging a premium for on-time services, we would like to ask the question: shouldn't shippers already expect the services to be reasonably on time, instead of being asked to pay more for this?

Due to the fact that European main ports are highly utilised, with little flexible capacity, it can be easy for congestion to build in a domino effect as a delay in one port can create a knock-on effect for others downstream, exacerbating the situation and limiting alternatives. 

Drewry consultants are having discussions with shippers on tactics to deal with recurring shipping delays, ranging from short- to long-term measures. It therefore looks to us as if the problem of shipping delays, even if contained, will not disappear completely.

We will continue to monitor and highlight issues with schedule reliability, cancelled sailings, long dwell times and port congestion to inform stakeholders on trends and the leading or lagging operators.

About Container Capacity Insight

Weekly analysis of container capacity, cancelled sailings, port congestion, service reliability and dwell time: With carriers continuing to carefully adjust their schedules to meet demand, access to a regularly updated picture of service availability is more important than ever. We closely analyse the various service and schedule data feeds to understand current container capacity and anticipated market development - by alliance across the main trades, and to provide historical context include year-on-year comparisons in the weekly analysis.

You might be interested in

Containership 2050: When the box becomes the customer
Containership 2050: When the box becomes the customer 17/11/2023

What could a sophisticated data- and analytics-driven supply chain in the container segment look like? Jan-Olaf Probst, Business Director – Containerships at DNV, shares a possible future of a fully digitalized and decarbonized market and what it will take to get there.

Indonesia Oct coal exports rise to multi-yr high, Kpler
Indonesia Oct coal exports rise to multi-yr high, Kpler 17/11/2023

Indonesia Oct coal exports rise to multi-yr high, Kpler

Container Shipping Bracing for Downturn, Hapag-Lloyd Chief Says
Container Shipping Bracing for Downturn, Hapag-Lloyd Chief Says 17/11/2023

The container shipping industry faces a few years of headwinds as low freight rates, a weak European economy and widening geopolitical turmoil cloud the outlook, the head of the world’s fifth-biggest carrier said.

India’s New Mega Port Hopes To Attract The World’s Biggest Ships
India’s New Mega Port Hopes To Attract The World’s Biggest Ships 24/10/2023

(Bloomberg) –When Zhen Hua 15 — a heavy load cargo carrier sailing from the East China sea — unloaded at Vizhinjam port on Sunday, it did more than just setting down the site’s first gigantic cranes. It also put India on the map for the world’s biggest container ships.